<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Murray Blackburn Mackenzie</provider_name><provider_url>https://murrayblackburnmackenzie.org</provider_url><author_name>Kath Murray</author_name><author_url>https://murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/author/kathmurray99/</author_url><title>Two recent court rulings in Scotland: bad news for Scotland's census but good news for public data collection - Murray Blackburn Mackenzie</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="xPktYLDUtI"&gt;&lt;a href="https://murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2022/02/27/two-recent-court-rulings-in-scotland-bad-news-for-scotlands-census-but-good-news-for-public-data-collection/"&gt;Two recent court rulings in Scotland: bad news for Scotland&#x2019;s census but good news for public data collection&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2022/02/27/two-recent-court-rulings-in-scotland-bad-news-for-scotlands-census-but-good-news-for-public-data-collection/embed/#?secret=xPktYLDUtI" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Two recent court rulings in Scotland: bad news for Scotland&#x2019;s census but good news for public data collection&#x201D; &#x2014; Murray Blackburn Mackenzie" data-secret="xPktYLDUtI" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://i0.wp.com/murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/pexels-photo-6077181.jpeg?fit=1880%2C1253&amp;ssl=1</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1880</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>1253</thumbnail_height><description>This blog considers two recent rulings by the Inner House of the Court of Session. These are the ruling in the Appeal case brought by&nbsp;For Women Scotland (FWS), which sought to overturn an earlier judgment in favour of the Scottish Government in relation to the Gender Representation in Public Boards Act, and the ruling in [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
